GLPwatch

Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A FAERS Database Analysis From 2018-2024.

J Drugs Dermatol · 2026

Last updated 2026-05-28

Between 2018 and 2024, up to 8.16% of people taking GLP-1 drugs like semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, or dulaglutide reported skin-related side effects such as rashes or itching. These reactions were more common in women and people around age 60, with semaglutide having the highest rate and dulaglutide the lowest. Compared to another diabetes drug class (DPP-4 inhibitors), GLP-1 drugs had fewer reported skin issues overall, though exenatide showed higher odds of such reactions.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalJ Drugs Dermatol, 2026
Citations0
Molecules

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly prescribed for conditions beyond type 2 diabetes, including psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Despite this, little is known about their dermatologic safety profiles. METHODS: We analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from 2018 to 2024 for semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, and dulaglutide. Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) were identified using MedDRA-coded terms: "rash," "pruritus," "urticaria," "alopecia," and "angioedema". Frequency and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were calculated using dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors as a comparator. Logistic regression assessed predictors of cutaneous AEs, with dulaglutide as a reference and sex, age, and GLP-1 RA type as independent variables. RESULTS: Cutaneous AEs were reported in up to 8.16% of GLP-1 RA cases, more often in females, with a mean patient age of 60. Semaglutide was associated with the highest rate, and dulaglutide the lowest. PRR analysis (0.27; 95% CI: 0.257-0.284) showed these AEs were proportionally less common relative to DPP-4 inhibitor users. Exenatide was associated with increased odds (OR = 5.01, 95% CI: 4.69–5.35), while liraglutide and semaglutide showed decreased odds. DISCUSSION: Possibly influenced by dosage, immune modulation, and patient perception of efficacy, cutaneous GLP-1RA adverse effects were less frequent than DPP-4 inhibitors, but still warrant clinician awareness. These reactions might impact patient adherence, which highlights the need for further investigation into their mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Cutaneous AEs are infrequent but vary by GLP-1 RA. Greater awareness may improve patient counseling as indications expand. &nbsp.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 41493256 ↗