GLPwatch

Efficacy of tirzepatide versus semaglutide in achieving therapeutic targets in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the SURPASS-2 Trial.

Diabetologia · 2026

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of 1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide (at doses of 5, 10, or 15 mg) was compared to semaglutide (1 mg) over 40 weeks. More participants taking tirzepatide met standard goals—such as blood sugar control, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and weight loss—than those taking semaglutide, with 57% meeting three or more standard goals on the highest tirzepatide dose versus 34% on semaglutide. Tirzepatide also helped more participants meet intensive goals, including greater weight loss and stricter blood sugar and blood pressure targets.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetologia, 2026
Citations0
Molecules semaglutide, tirzepatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Simultaneous control of HbA, lipid profile, BP and body weight is essential for preventing chronic complications of type 2 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies improve all these variables but whether the dual GLP-1 / glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonist tirzepatide is superior to semaglutide in attaining therapeutic targets remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the SURPASS-2 trial, a randomised phase 3 study including 1879 adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomised to receive tirzepatide (5, 10 or 15 mg) or semaglutide (1 mg). In this analysis, we compared the effects of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on the attainment of standard (HbA <53 mmol/mol [7%], BP <140/90 mmHg, LDL-cholesterol <1.8 mmol/l, >10% weight loss) and intensive (HbA <48 mmol/mol [6.5%], BP <130/80 mmHg, LDL-cholesterol <1.4 mmol/l , >15% weight loss) therapeutic targets at 40 weeks. RESULTS: In the SURPASS-2 trial, at baseline, 19% of participants were on target for attaining no standard goals, 59% for one goal and 21% for two or more goals. For intensive therapeutic targets, 58% of participants were on target for attaining zero goals, 38% for one goal and 4% for two goals. All doses of tirzepatide increased the number of achieved standard and intensive targets compared with semaglutide. For standard targets, 34% of participants treated with semaglutide met three or more targets, compared with 42%, 53% and 57% with tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg, respectively. For intensive targets, 8% of participants treated with semaglutide met three or more targets, vs 15%, 20% and 29% with tirzepatide. Regarding specific therapeutic goals, tirzepatide increased the odds of achieving standard and intensive targets for HbA (HbA <53 mmol/mol [7%], OR 1.50 [95% CI 1.12, 2.00]; HbA <48 mmol/mol [6.5%], OR 1.88 [95%CI 1.49, 2.36]) and weight loss (weight loss >10%, OR 2.72 [95% CI 2.14, 3.47]; weight loss >15%, OR 3.86 [95% CI 2.69, 5.55]) and the intensive target for BP (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.17, 1.81]). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Tirzepatide improves therapeutic target attainment compared with semaglutide in type 2 diabetes. Longer trials are needed to confirm benefits on long-term prognosis. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data for this post hoc analysis was accessed through the Vivli (Center for Global Clinical Research Data) platform ( https://vivli.org ) with the Vivli ID 00009964.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 41419618 ↗

Related research