GLPwatch

Temporal and subgroup disparities in mediation effects on cardiovascular outcomes with liraglutide and semaglutide: a post-hoc analysis of LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 trials.

Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study analyzed two trials with a total of 12,637 participants to see how blood sugar control, kidney function, and blood pressure influenced the heart benefits of two GLP-1 drugs, liraglutide and semaglutide. Blood sugar control was the biggest factor in reducing major heart events for both drugs, accounting for 38.2% of liraglutide’s effect and 51.8% of semaglutide’s effect. The impact of blood sugar control on liraglutide’s benefits increased over time, while it stayed steady for semaglutide. In patients with kidney disease or existing heart conditions, blood sugar control remained the most important factor for both drugs.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalCardiovasc Diabetol, 2025
Citations1
Molecules semaglutide, liraglutide
Conditions studied Cardiovascular Risk Reduction, Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the time-varying mediation effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on the three-point major adverse cardiovascular event (3P-MACE) outcomes, including nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, via HbA, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) vary by types of GLP-1RAs, and patient subgroups. METHODS: A causal mediation analysis was applied to assess the mediation effects of HbA, UACR, and SBP on the 3P-MACE with liraglutide and semaglutide over time, using the LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 trials. We further explored the heterogeneity in mediation effects in subsets of vulnerable patients, including those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m or established cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). RESULTS: Individual-level data consisting of 9340 (liraglutide: 4668; placebo: 4672) and 3297 (semaglutide: 1648; placebo: 1649) subjects from the LEADER and SUSTAIN-6 trials, respectively, was utilized for this study. The study population aged around 64.2-64.4/64.4-64.8 years old, with 64.0%-64.5%/58.5%-63.0% of males, and having a diabetes duration of 12.8-12.9/13.2-14.3 years in the LEADER/SUSTAIN-6 trials, respectively. Among study populations, those established CVDs (e.g., heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction) accounted for 14.0%-35.4% in the LEADER trial, whereas 13.7%-61.9% in the SUSTAIN-6 trial. At the end of each trial, HbA contributed the most to liraglutide's/semaglutide's effect on 3P-MACE (38.2%, 95% confidence interval: 13.8%-194.5%/51.8%, 29.6%-86.7%), followed by UACR (17.9%, 8.5%-61.9%/12.4%, 6.1%-32.4%) and SBP (6.8%, 2.2%-31.0%/6.7%, 2.9%-11.7%), respectively. Over the trial period, the effect of liraglutide mediated by HbA increased from 31.3% to 38.2%, whereas the effects of semaglutide mediated by HbA remained stable from 52.5% to 51.8%. For patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m, HbA was the leading mediator (35.2%) of semaglutide-associated 3P-MACE, while the mediation effects via HbA (7.2%), UACR (11.8%), and SBP (5.1%) on liraglutide-associated 3P-MACE seemed similar and smaller. For patients with established CVDs, HbA was the leading mediator of liraglutide- (25.3%) and semaglutide-associated 3P-MACE (51.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The HbA-mediated effects of liraglutide and semaglutide varied over time and across patient subgroups. HbA consistently explained a larger proportion of mediation compared to UACR and SBP, with patterns suggesting that mediation through HbA may differ by underlying risk factors.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 41286734 ↗

Related research