Comparative Renal Safety of Tirzepatide and Semaglutide: An FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)-Disproportionality Study.
J Clin Med · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28A study analyzed 133,872 reports of side effects from tirzepatide (92,807 cases) and semaglutide (41,065 cases) between January 2022 and September 2025. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was reported in 0.47% of tirzepatide cases and 1.07% of semaglutide cases, with tirzepatide showing a lower reporting frequency for AKI compared to semaglutide.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Clin Med, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 0 |
| Molecules | semaglutide, tirzepatide |
| Conditions studied | Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a serious complication among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed and often regarded as kidney-protective, yet post-marketing reports have linked them to AKI. Tirzepatide, a newer dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist, shows well-documented metabolic benefits, but its renal safety in real-world use is not well characterized. We conducted a disproportionality analysis of the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2022 to September 2025. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were used to compare AKI reporting between tirzepatide and semaglutide. Among 133,872 reports (92,807 tirzepatide; 41,065 semaglutide), AKI was listed in 432 (0.47%) and 440 (1.07%) cases, respectively. The ROR for tirzepatide versus semaglutide was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.38-0.50), suggesting a lower reporting frequency for AKI with tirzepatide. In this real-world pharmacovigilance analysis, semaglutide but not tirzepatide showed a disproportionality signal for AKI. While causality cannot be confirmed, clinicians should ensure hydration and renal monitoring when initiating GLP-1 RAs, particularly semaglutide. Semaglutide showed a higher AKI reporting rate than tirzepatide, though these findings should be interpreted cautiously given reporting bias and potential confounders. Both agents appear safe, with low AKI frequency in practice. Further studies should determine if differences reflect biological or reporting effects. These findings support the need for larger epidemiologic studies to define risk modifiers and optimize clinical safety strategies.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 41227073 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.