GLPwatch

68 Ga-NODAGA-EXENDIN-4 PET/CT in the Detection or the Exclusion of Occult Sporadic Insulinomas.

Clin Nucl Med · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of 50 scans on 44 patients with suspected but undetected insulinomas, a specialized imaging test called 68 Ga-NODAGA-Exendin-4 PET/CT correctly identified insulinomas in 62% of cases (31 out of 50). All positive scans led to successful surgeries, and negative scans helped rule out insulinomas in 14 of 19 patients. The test performed equally well in patients taking blood sugar-lowering drugs or under 18 years old, with only one patient experiencing low blood sugar after the scan.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalClin Nucl Med, 2025
Citations0
Molecules
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis and localization of insulinomas remain challenging. Imaging with contrast-enhanced CT, PET with somatostatin analogs, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasonography is often inconclusive. GLP1 receptor radioligands can specifically target insulinomas. A recent multicenter trial reported the superior performance of 68 Ga-NODAGA-Exendin-4 (EX) PET/CT for the detection of benign insulinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty EX-PET/CTs (individually authorized by the French Medicine Agency) were performed on 44 patients with a suspected sporadic insulinoma, based on biochemistry and clinical signs, but without a target lesion identified by imaging. A composite reference standard was based on postsurgical histology and/or follow-up data over 6-45 months after the EX-PET/CT. RESULTS: The examination-based EX-PET/CT positivity rate was 62% (31/50), equivocal 0. Positive EX-PET/CTs were confirmed by the outcomes of all 29 EX-guided resections (PPV 100%), including 2 re-operations following partial resection. Furthermore, the suspected diagnosis of an insulinoma was abandoned in 12 patients after 14 of 19 negative EX-PET/CTs. Suspicion of occult insulinoma remained in 5 patients. EX-PET/CT performed similarly well in patients treated by antihypoglycemic drugs and/or younger than 18 years. Since no extra-pancreatic EX abnormal foci were observed, the EX-PET/CT field-of-view to the upper abdomen should be sufficient. Only 1 patient experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia after EX injection. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of suspected insulinomas with nondiagnostic imaging, the performance of EX-PET/CT for the detection of nonmalignant sporadic insulinomas was excellent, with a 29/50 (58%) rate of major impact on patients' management. A negative EX-PET/CT appears to be a confident predictor to rule out the presence of sporadic insulinoma.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 41223138 ↗