The Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity.
Ann Intern Med · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28A study compared the cost-effectiveness of two GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide and tirzepatide, for people with knee osteoarthritis and obesity. Tirzepatide provided greater health benefits at a lower cost than semaglutide, with an estimated $57,400 cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared to diet and exercise. Tirzepatide had a 64% chance of being cost-effective at a $100,000 per QALY threshold, while semaglutide had a 34% chance.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Ann Intern Med, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 2 |
| Molecules | semaglutide, tirzepatide |
| Conditions studied | Obesity |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) lead to substantial weight loss and pain reduction in persons with knee osteoarthritis and obesity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 2 GLP1RAs, semaglutide and tirzepatide, for patients with osteoarthritis and obesity.
DESIGN: Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated microsimulation model of knee osteoarthritis, to estimate lifetime benefits and costs of weight loss strategies.
DATA SOURCES: Published data to derive treatment-related weight loss, pain reduction, and costs of GLP1RAs from the U.S. Office of Health Policy.
TARGET POPULATION: Persons with knee osteoarthritis and obesity in the United States. The base-case cohort had a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score of 71 (0 to 100, 100 worst) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m.
TIME HORIZON: Lifetime.
PERSPECTIVE: Health care, societal.
INTERVENTION: Semaglutide, tirzepatide, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and diet and exercise.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide provided greater health benefits at lower costs than semaglutide and yielded a $57 400 per QALY ICER versus diet and exercise. For those eligible, RYGB provided greater health benefits at lower costs than the 2 GLP1RAs and had a $30 700 per QALY ICER versus LSG.
RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide's ICER was most sensitive to changes in medication costs, treatment efficacy, and cohort baseline BMI. Tirzepatide had a 64% and semaglutide had a 34% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY threshold.
LIMITATION: Data from multiple sources.
CONCLUSION: Both tirzepatide and semaglutide would be widely considered cost-effective when compared directly with usual care. Tirzepatide would offer the most favorable return on investment to decision makers whose cost-effectiveness thresholds exceed $57 400 per QALY.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Arthritis Foundation and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40953447 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.