GLPwatch

The Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Obesity.

Ann Intern Med · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study compared the cost-effectiveness of two GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide and tirzepatide, for people with knee osteoarthritis and obesity. Tirzepatide provided greater health benefits at a lower cost than semaglutide, with an estimated $57,400 cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared to diet and exercise. Tirzepatide had a 64% chance of being cost-effective at a $100,000 per QALY threshold, while semaglutide had a 34% chance.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalAnn Intern Med, 2025
Citations2
Molecules semaglutide, tirzepatide
Conditions studied Obesity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) lead to substantial weight loss and pain reduction in persons with knee osteoarthritis and obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 2 GLP1RAs, semaglutide and tirzepatide, for patients with osteoarthritis and obesity. DESIGN: Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated microsimulation model of knee osteoarthritis, to estimate lifetime benefits and costs of weight loss strategies. DATA SOURCES: Published data to derive treatment-related weight loss, pain reduction, and costs of GLP1RAs from the U.S. Office of Health Policy. TARGET POPULATION: Persons with knee osteoarthritis and obesity in the United States. The base-case cohort had a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score of 71 (0 to 100, 100 worst) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care, societal. INTERVENTION: Semaglutide, tirzepatide, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and diet and exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide provided greater health benefits at lower costs than semaglutide and yielded a $57 400 per QALY ICER versus diet and exercise. For those eligible, RYGB provided greater health benefits at lower costs than the 2 GLP1RAs and had a $30 700 per QALY ICER versus LSG. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Tirzepatide's ICER was most sensitive to changes in medication costs, treatment efficacy, and cohort baseline BMI. Tirzepatide had a 64% and semaglutide had a 34% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY threshold. LIMITATION: Data from multiple sources. CONCLUSION: Both tirzepatide and semaglutide would be widely considered cost-effective when compared directly with usual care. Tirzepatide would offer the most favorable return on investment to decision makers whose cost-effectiveness thresholds exceed $57 400 per QALY. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Arthritis Foundation and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40953447 ↗

Related research