Effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide on arterial inflammation in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease using PET-MRI: Primary results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Am Heart J · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28In a 26-week study of 101 people with type 2 diabetes and heart disease, once-weekly semaglutide at 1.0 mg did not show a significant difference compared to placebo in reducing inflammation in carotid artery plaques, as measured by PET-MRI scans. The trial also assessed plaque structure at 52 weeks but did not report significant treatment effects. The study suggests the imaging method may not have been sensitive enough to detect changes in plaque inflammation.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Am Heart J, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 4 |
| Molecules | semaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Semaglutide has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Inflammation plays a well-documented role in atherosclerosis and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, like semaglutide, have shown anti-inflammatory effects in animal and clinical studies. This trial investigated the effect of semaglutide on atherosclerotic inflammation in the carotid arteries using positron emission tomography (PET)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Patients with T2D and CVD were randomized to double-blinded once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg or placebo. The primary and key secondary endpoints used PET-MRI with [F]FDG and [Ga]DOTATATE tracers to assess change from baseline to week 26 in plaque inflammation in the segments of the carotid arteries that were determined to be the most diseased and where plaque inflammation was quantified by the maximum target-to-background ratio (TBR) of the tracers. Additional secondary endpoints assessed plaque morphology and burden using MRI at week 52, including total wall volume, lipid-rich necrotic core volume, and fibrous cap thickness.
RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 87.1% were male, mean age was 66 years and they were well-treated according to guidelines. No significant treatment differences were observed between semaglutide and placebo for change in plaque inflammation at week 26 with either tracer; TBR of FDG (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: 0.033, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.118;0.184) and [Ga]DOTATATE (ETD: 0.045, 95% CI: -0.314;0.404).
CONCLUSIONS: This trial explored the feasibility of following plaque inflammation with PET-MRI using [F]FDG and [Ga]DOTATATE. A significant effect of semaglutide versus placebo on carotid plaque inflammation could not be detected through the methodology used in this trial, likely due to minimal baseline inflammation. However, this does not exclude an effect of semaglutide on inflammation seen in previous preclinical and clinical studies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04032197.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40345413 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity.