Efficacy of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Exenatide in Patients Undergoing CABG or Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 1,389 adults undergoing open-heart surgery, those given a 17.4 microgram infusion of the GLP-1 drug exenatide during and after surgery were compared to a placebo group. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years, 24% in both groups experienced a major event like death, stroke, kidney failure requiring dialysis, or worsening heart failure, showing no significant difference between the groups.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 0 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists have been proven beneficial in reducing the risk of and injury associated with several cardiovascular diseases. The efficacy in cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted cardiac surgery is unknown. This trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of an infusion of the GLP-1 agonist exenatide during and after open-heart surgery in reducing the risk of death and major organ failure.
METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, 2-by-2 factorial design, single-center clinical trial, also including liberal (FiO of 100%) or restrictive (FiO of 50%) oxygenation during and after bypass. The present article presents the results of the exenatide intervention. We included adult patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. Patients were predominantly low risk. The intervention was an infusion of 17.4 µg of exenatide or placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first hour after weaning thereof. The main outcome was time to a composite end point consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new/worsening heart failure during follow-up. Secondary end points included occurrence of prespecified adverse events.
RESULTS: A total of 1389 patients were included in the analyses. Within a follow-up period of a median of 5.9 years (min-max; 2.5-8.3 years), 170 (24%) patients in the exenatide group and 165 (24%) patients experienced a primary end point. We found no difference in time to the first event between patients randomized to FiO 50% versus FiO 100% (hazard ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.83-1.3]; =0.80). We found no significant difference in rates of adverse events between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide during cardiopulmonary bypass and weaning thereof did not significantly reduce the incidence of death, stroke, renal failure, or new/worsening heart failure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02673931.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40265262 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.