Disproportionality analysis on semaglutide and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in the FDA adverse event reporting system: An emerging pharmacovigilance signal?
Obes Res Clin Pract · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28A review of U.S. adverse event reports found 96 cases of a rare eye condition called NAION linked to semaglutide, with 83 cases specifically tied to this drug. The analysis showed a strong statistical signal only for semaglutide, with a reporting odds ratio of 17.57 (95% confidence interval: 13.93–21.90), meaning reports of NAION were much more common with semaglutide than with other diabetes or weight-loss drugs. Most cases occurred within about 6 months of starting the medication, and reports surged in the last 3 months of available data, including 18 cases from Denmark.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Obes Res Clin Pract, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 10 |
| Relative citation ratio | 4.45 |
| Molecules | semaglutide |
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: On January 17th 2025, the European Medicines Agency started a review on semaglutide and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION); we gained insight into this potential association by appraising post-marketing reporting.
METHODS: We queried the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (up to December 2024) to retrieve cases of NAION reported with GLP-1 receptor agonists. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with 95 % confidence Interval (CI). Signal of Disproportionate Reporting (SDR) was defined by a lower limit of the 95 %CI> 1. To account for potential confounding by indication and channeling bias, active-comparator restricted design and disproportionality by therapeutic area were performed by comparing semaglutide vs other antidiabetic/antiobesity drugs, including SGLT2-inhibitors.
RESULTS: 96 NAION cases were retrieved (83 to semaglutide), peaking 53 in last 3 months (18 from Denmark), with a median time to onset of 186 days. An SDR emerged only for semaglutide (ROR=17.57; 95 %CI=13.93-21.90), and remained significant across comparators and therapeutic indications.
CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding limitations, including inability to infer causality, the consistency of disproportionality against a wide range of confounders together with other observational evidence raised the hypothesis of a safety signal, especially from Denmark. The exponential reporting trend calls for urgent clarification of drug-, patient- and Country-related risk factors.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40133108 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity.