Time spent in glycaemic control with sustained body weight reduction with tirzepatide: A post hoc analysis of the SURPASS clinical trial programme.
Diabetes Obes Metab · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 6,246 people with type 2 diabetes, those taking tirzepatide spent a median of 77% to 85% of their treatment time with blood sugar control (HbA1c below 7%) compared to 62% with insulin degludec and 23% with insulin glargine over 52 weeks. Participants on tirzepatide also spent more time with at least 5% weight loss (20% to 77%) than those on semaglutide (25%) or placebo (0%). The longest combined time with both controlled blood sugar (HbA1c 6.5% or lower) and at least 5% weight loss was seen with tirzepatide (35% to 60%) versus 7% with semaglutide.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Obes Metab, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Molecules | tirzepatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity |
Abstract
AIMS: This participant-level exploratory analysis assessed the continuous time spent in glycaemic control and/or with sustained weight reductions with tirzepatide treatment in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the SURPASS programme.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants (N = 6246) from SURPASS 1-5 were randomized to once weekly tirzepatide (5, 10 or 15 mg) or comparator (once weekly placebo, once weekly semaglutide 1 mg, insulin degludec or insulin glargine). Continuous time spent with HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), ≤6.5% (48 mmol/mol) and ≥5% body weight reduction and combined HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) with a ≥5% body weight reduction were assessed through 40 weeks (SURPASS-1, -2, and -5) or 52 weeks (SURPASS-3 and -4). The non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the median duration of continuous time spent in control, and logistic regression was used to analyse the proportion of participants achieving glycaemic control and body weight reduction at any time points or at the end of the primary study period.
RESULTS: Median time spent with HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was 80% (tirzepatide) versus 70% (semaglutide) and 0% (placebo) of the treatment duration in 40-week studies, and 77%-85% (tirzepatide) versus 62% (insulin degludec) and 23% (insulin glargine) of the treatment duration in 52-week studies (p < 0.001). Time spent with HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was generally similar across all tirzepatide doses in each study. Dose-dependent increases in time spent with ≥5% body weight reduction were observed with tirzepatide (median time spent: 20%-77% with tirzepatide versus 25% with semaglutide 1 mg) (p < 0.001). Tirzepatide-treated participants experienced longer time spent with HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) and ≥5% body weight reduction versus semaglutide (median: 35%-60% vs. 7%) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, people with T2D experienced substantially longer continuous time in glycaemic control and more sustained body weight reductions with tirzepatide versus placebo and active comparators.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 40083081 ↗
Related research
- Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.
- Tirzepatide for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis with Liver Fibrosis.
- Tirzepatide for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity.
- Continued Treatment With Tirzepatide for Maintenance of Weight Reduction in Adults With Obesity: The SURMOUNT-4 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
- Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial.