GLPwatch

Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for Weight Loss in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Clin Transl Sci · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

A review of three studies with 922 participants found that once-weekly semaglutide led to greater reductions in body weight (-4.55%), blood sugar control (-0.46% in HbA1c), and fasting blood sugar (-1.23 mmol/L) compared to once-daily liraglutide. The rates of severe and gastrointestinal side effects were similar between the two drugs.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalClin Transl Sci, 2025
Citations9
Relative citation ratio3.46
Molecules semaglutide, liraglutide
Conditions studied Obesity

Abstract

The effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in facilitating weight loss among patients with diabetes is widely recognized. However, there are limited data available on the relative effectiveness and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases from inception until July 2024. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.4.1 with the "meta" package, employing a random effects model. Three RCTs with a total of 922 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that OW semaglutide significantly reduced body weight (WMD: -4.55; 95% CI: -6.43, -2.67, p < 0.01), HbA1c (WMD: -0.46; 95% CI: -0.84, -0.08; p = 0.02), and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD: -1.23; 95% CI: -1.51, -0.95; p < 0.01) in comparison to OD liraglutide. The risk of severe adverse effects (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.53-5.16; p = 0.38) and gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.82-4.14; p = 0.14) was comparable between both groups. Once-weekly semaglutide therapy results in a more pronounced loss in body weight, HbA1c, and fasting glucose levels compared to once-daily liraglutide.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 39930946 ↗

Related research