GLPwatch

Oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide weight loss outcomes after two years among patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world database.

Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab · 2025

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of adults with type 2 diabetes over two years, those using subcutaneous semaglutide lost an average of 7.5% of their body weight (about 16.7 pounds), with 58.7% losing at least 5% and 32.9% losing at least 10%. Those using oral semaglutide lost an average of 4.4% (about 8.7 pounds), with 50.9% losing at least 5% and 17.5% losing at least 10%.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalExpert Rev Endocrinol Metab, 2025
Citations4
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interest has grown in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study compared effectiveness of oral and subcutaneous semaglutide for weight loss outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a 2-year treatment period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Weight loss was evaluated through mean percentage change from baseline, proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss and at least 10% weight loss comparing subcutaneous ( = 310) versus oral users ( = 57) and by age group. RESULTS: Subcutaneous users experienced a mean percentage weight loss of 7.5% (16.7 pounds) with 58.7% and 32.9% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Oral users lost 4.4% (8.7 pounds) with 50.9% and 17.5% achieving ≥5% and ≥10% loss, respectively. Significant differences existed between formulations in mean percentage weight change (p-value <0.01) and proportion achieving ≥10% loss (p-value = 0.03), but not in proportion achieving ≥5% loss (p-value = 0.34). Outcomes differed by age within oral semaglutide (p-value = 0.02). Regression analyses adjusted for confounders yielded similar findings. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous users achieved superior weight loss compared to oral users. Older oral users experienced better weight loss compared to younger users. However, no differences were observed between subcutaneous users.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 39921267 ↗

Related research