Semaglutide and the risk of adverse liver outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Hepatol Int · 2025
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 648,070 adults with both nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes, those taking semaglutide had a 24% to 28% lower risk of major liver problems—such as severe liver damage, liver cancer, or needing a transplant—compared to those taking other diabetes drugs like SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, or thiazolidinediones. Semaglutide users also had a lower risk of death from any cause compared to users of these other medications.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Hepatol Int, 2025 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 15 |
| Relative citation ratio | 6.03 |
| Molecules | semaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Mash |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Semaglutide has shown potential liver benefits in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, no direct comparisons have been made between semaglutide and other antidiabetic medications, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), thiazolidinediones (TZD), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), regarding liver outcomes in patients with both NAFLD and T2D.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX electronic health record database, a multinational and multi-institutional database. Adults with NAFLD and T2D who received their first prescription for either semaglutide or other antidiabetic medications were included. New users of semaglutide were matched 1:1 via propensity score matching with users of SGLT2i, DPP-4i, and TZD. The primary outcome was major adverse liver outcome (MALO), a composite end point consisting of decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of MALO and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 648,070 adult patients with T2D and NAFLD were identified, and patients were categorized into three different comparison groups based on their drug of interest. Semaglutide was associated with a lower risk of MALO compared to SGLT2i (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.88), DPP-4i (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.56-0.86), and TZD (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.56-0.99). Additionally, semaglutide was linked to a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to SGLT2i (aHR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.53-0.72), DPP-4i (aHR, 0.42; 95% CI 0.36-0.49), and TZD (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.83).
CONCLUSION: Semaglutide is associated with better liver outcomes and a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to SGLT2i, DPP-4i, and TZD in patients with NAFLD and T2D.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 39602049 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity.