Benchmarking the medication efficiency and technological progress of diabetes drugs.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes poses a serious global challenge, given its increasing prevalence, detrimental effects on public health, and substantial economic burden. Since 1950s, tens of drugs have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the past decade, the medical community and regulatory agencies have moved away from the glucose-centric paradigm and increasingly call for a holistic approach to assess different treatments' benefits and harms. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the medication efficiency and technological progress of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) drugs, by considering their physiological outcomes, including both benefits (i.e., glucose lowering and weight loss) and adverse effects (mortality), relative to dosing frequency. METHODS: To derive medication efficiency, this study utilized data from the US FDA and prominent meta-analyses. Given that both the benefits and adverse effects of medications are multidimensional, this study employed a nonparametric frontier method, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, to integrate these factors into a measure of medication efficiency. Physiological outcomes could assume both positive and negative values. Adverse effects were regarded undesirable outputs. The DEA model was built under the framework of directional distance function and was able to handle negative and undesirable values which naturally arose in the case of T2D medications. RESULTS: The paper presented a ranking of 20 T2D drugs in terms of medication efficiency. Three of them were able to attain the highest medication efficiency, all of which were in the GLP-1 class, including oral Semaglutide, subcutaneous Semaglutide and Dulaglutide. However, the other two GLP-1 drugs, Lixisenatide and Liraglutide, were less efficient. The average medication efficiency of drugs approved post-2010 was significantly higher than pre-2010 drugs. High dose frequency, low HbA1c reduction and insignificant weight loss were the main driving factors behind inefficiencies. Overall, medication efficiency provided an alternative perspective on treatment effectiveness other than conventional measures such as cost-effectiveness.