GLPwatch

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke associated with treatment with GLP-1 or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Stroke J · 2024

Last updated 2026-05-28

A review of 13 clinical trials involving 65,878 people with type 2 diabetes found that GLP-1 drugs or the dual GIP/GLP-1 drug tirzepatide lowered the risk of major heart problems by 13% and reduced all-cause death by 12% compared to a placebo. GLP-1 drugs also cut the risk of stroke by 16% and nonfatal stroke by 15%, with the strongest effect seen for ischemic stroke, but did not clearly affect fatal strokes or heart attacks.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalEur Stroke J, 2024
Citations44
Relative citation ratio8.43
NIH percentile97
Molecules tirzepatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mounting evidence suggests that glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1 RAs) attenuate cardiovascular-risk in type-2 diabetes (T2DM). Tirzepatide is the first-in-class, dual glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide GIP/GLP-1 RA approved for T2DM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to estimate: (i) the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); and (ii) incidence of stroke, fatal, and nonfatal stroke in T2DM-patients treated with GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs (vs placebo). RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs (9 and 4 on GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide, respectively) comprising 65,878 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo, GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.94;  < 0.01;  = 37%), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.96;  < 0.01;  = 21%) and cardiovascular-mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.96;  < 0.01;  = 14%), without differences between GLP-1 versus GIP/GLP-1 RAs. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs reduced the odds of stroke (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.93;  < 0.01;  = 0%) and nonfatal stroke (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.94;  < 0.01;  = 0%), whereas no association between fatal stroke and GLP-1RAs was uncovered (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61-1.05;  = 0.105;  = 0%). In secondary analyses, GLP-1 RAs prevented ischemic stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61-0.91;  < 0.01;  = 0%) and MACE-recurrence, but not hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.51-1.66;  = 0.792;  = 0%). There was no association between GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs and fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: GLP-1 and GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular-risk and mortality in T2DM. While there is solid evidence that GLP-1 RAs significantly attenuate the risk of ischemic stroke in T2DM, dedicated RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of novel GIP/GLP-1 RAs for primary and secondary stroke prevention.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 38400569 ↗

Related research