Effects of exenatide on coronary stent's endothelialization in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. The Rebuild study.
Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2023
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 38 people with type 2 diabetes who received a drug-eluting stent, those given exenatide once weekly for 12 weeks had 95% strut coverage compared to 91.4% in the control group, a difference that was not statistically significant. No meaningful differences were found between the groups in stent blockage (15.5% vs 14.7%) or new tissue growth inside the stent (0.2 mm in both groups).
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.13 |
| NIH percentile | 9 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. The activation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) has been suggested to induce several effects on the vasculature that may reduce the risk of stent failure following an angioplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the GLP-1R agonist exenatide on endothelialization of a modern drug-eluting stent (DES) in subjects with T2D.
METHODS: 38 subjects with T2D who were eligible for revascularization with implantation of DES were randomized to treatment with exenatide (once weekly) plus standard treatment, or to standard treatment alone. After 12 weeks, a new coronary angiography was performed to evaluate the percentage of strut coverage (primary endpoint) and the presence of neo-atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. This study was approved by the Stockholm's Ethical Review Board.
RESULTS: The two groups were well balanced regarding baseline clinical characteristics. Strut coverage was 95% (88.7-98.5%) in the exenatide group and 91.4% (88.8-98.5%) in the control group (p = 0.692). There were no significant differences between groups neither in the thickness of neo-intima (0.2 mm in both groups, p = 0.471), nor the maximal in-stent obstruction by neo-intima (15.5% in exenatide group vs 14.7% in control group, p = 0.801). No significant differences were detected in the rate of target lesion revascularization between groups (p = 0.224).
CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks treatment with exenatide did not lead to a significantly better stent coverage in people with T2D. No significant differences in the occurrence of neo-atherosclerosis were detected between groups.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov (Rebuild Study, NCT02621489).
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 38066597 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.