GLPwatch

Liraglutide versus semaglutide for weight reduction-a cost needed to treat analysis.

Obesity (Silver Spring) · 2023

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study compared the cost-effectiveness of liraglutide and semaglutide for weight loss using data from two trials. Liraglutide led to an average 5.4% weight loss at a cost of $3,256 per 1% reduction, while semaglutide resulted in a 12.4% weight loss at $1,845 per 1% reduction. Semaglutide was found to provide better value for money than liraglutide.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalObesity (Silver Spring), 2023
Citations19
Relative citation ratio2.39
NIH percentile79
Molecules semaglutide, liraglutide
Conditions studied Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Higher doses of the glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists liraglutide and, more recently, semaglutide have demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight. However, their comparative value for money for this indication is unclear. METHODS: The cost needed to treat to achieve a 1% reduction in body weight using semaglutide or liraglutide was calculated. The body weight reductions were extracted from the published STEP 1 trial and the SCALE trial results, respectively. A scenario analysis was performed to mitigate the primary differences between the two studies' populations. Drug costs were based on US GoodRx prices as of October 2022. RESULTS: Liraglutide in STEP 1 resulted in a weight loss of 5.4% (95% CI: 5%-5.8%). Semaglutide in SCALE resulted in a weight loss of 12.4% (95% CI: 11.5%-13.4%). The total cost of therapy with liraglutide during the trial was estimated at $17,585 compared with $22,878 with semaglutide. Accordingly, the cost needed to treat per 1% of body weight reduction with liraglutide is estimated at $3256 (95% CI: $3032-$3517) compared with $1845 (95% CI: $1707-$1989) with semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide provides significantly better value for money than liraglutide for weight reduction.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 37203328 ↗

Related research