GLPwatch

Indicators of Kidney Fibrosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease Treated with Dulaglutide.

Am J Nephrol · 2023

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of 330 people with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, those given dulaglutide for 52 weeks showed a 4.6% decrease in a marker of kidney scarring (PRO-C6) compared to a 5.7% increase in those given insulin glargine. Meanwhile, a second marker (C3M) increased by 20.7% with dulaglutide versus a 16.9% decrease with insulin glargine. Changes in these markers were linked to better kidney function (eGFR) in the dulaglutide group.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalAm J Nephrol, 2023
Citations23
Relative citation ratio2.49
NIH percentile80
Molecules dulaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the AWARD-7 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, once-weekly dulaglutide slowed the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased the urine albumin/creatinine ratio compared to insulin glargine at the end of 52 weeks of treatment. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, changes in two fibrosis biomarkers, serum PRO-C6 (type VI collagen formation) and urine C3M (type III collagen degradation), were evaluated. METHODS: In the groups treated with dulaglutide 1.5 mg or insulin glargine (N = 330), serum PRO-C6 and urine C3M were measured using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Biomarker changes were assessed by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to determine associations between changes in kidney fibrosis biomarkers and eGFR measures at 52 weeks. RESULTS: At weeks 26 and 52 of treatment in the overall population, serum PRO-C6 levels were significantly lower in the dulaglutide group versus insulin glargine group with percent change from baseline of (least squares mean ± standard error) -4.6% ± 1.9 and -0.2% ± 2.2 versus 5.7% ± 2.0 and 8.0% ± 2.3 (p < 0.01), respectively, and urine C3M levels were significantly higher in the dulaglutide group versus insulin glargine group with percent change from baseline of 10.9% ± 8.2 and 20.7% ± 8.8 versus -10.0% ± 6.5 and -16.9% ± 6.4 (p < 0.05), respectively. These findings appeared greater in the subgroup with macroalbuminuria. Serum PRO-C6 negatively correlated with eGFR, while urine C3M positively correlated with eGFR. CONCLUSION: Dulaglutide treatment was associated with biomarker changes that indicated lower type VI collagen formation and higher type III collagen degradation compared to treatment with insulin glargine, suggesting a potential drug effect to reduce kidney fibrosis.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 36754023 ↗

Related research