A Single-dose, Two-Period Crossover Bioequivalence Study Comparing Two Liraglutide Formulations in Healthy Chinese Subjects.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev · 2023
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 32 healthy Chinese adults, researchers compared a new liraglutide formulation (a GLP-1 drug for blood sugar control) to the original version. The new drug met the criteria for bioequivalence, with its maximum concentration and overall exposure falling within 80% to 125% of the original drug’s levels. Both versions had similar safety profiles, with mostly mild side effects, mostly related to the stomach and intestines.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 2023 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 0 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.00 |
| NIH percentile | 0 |
| Molecules | liraglutide |
Abstract
Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The original liraglutide products are costly, which limits patient access to this therapeutic treatment. Herein, a biosimilar was developed that is highly similar to the reference drug in molecular structure and bioactivity, and is expected to have similar pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles in clinical studies. This study aimed to primarily evaluate the bioequivalence of 2 liraglutide formulations and secondarily assess their safety in healthy Chinese subjects following a single-dose subcutaneous injection. Thirty-two healthy volunteers were recruited in this randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover bioequivalence study (ChiCTR2100043348). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the test drug to the reference drug (T/R) and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for maximum concentration (C ) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC ) were estimated using a mixed-effects model, and bioequivalence was determined to have been achieved if the 2-sided 90%CI fell within the predefined range of 80%-125%. PK parameters were comparable between T and R, with GMRs of T/R for C and AUC being 105.7% and 107.7%, respectively, the 90%CI of which met the acceptance criteria for bioequivalence. We also observed a similar and favorable safety profile in the T and R arms, with adverse events being predominantly mild in severity and of gastrointestinal origin. Our findings indicate that the test drug is safe and well tolerated, bioequivalent to the reference drug, and warrants further testing in a phase III clinical trial.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 36648126 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide.