Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists and A1c: Good for the heart but less so for the eyes?
Diabetes Metab Syndr · 2023
Last updated 2026-05-28A review of 7 major studies involving 56,004 people found that GLP-1 drugs overall did not significantly increase the risk of worsening diabetic eye disease (retinopathy), though one drug, semaglutide, did show a higher risk. The analysis also showed that larger drops in blood sugar control (measured by A1c) were linked to fewer heart problems but a slightly higher chance of eye disease worsening, especially with semaglutide used for over a year or when A1c dropped by more than 1.0%.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Metab Syndr, 2023 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 16 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.88 |
| NIH percentile | 72 |
| Molecules | — |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glucagon-like peptide1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) decrease major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Caution is recommended for semaglutide and dulaglutide with risk of exacerbating diabetic retinopathy (DR). Analyses were performed to determine if worsening of DR was dependent on drug class or fall in A1c.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Meta-analyses and meta-regressions (MR) were performed on the 7 major cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOTs) (n = 56004 patients) of GLP1-RA. A second analysis of 11 studies (n = 11894 subjects) with semaglutide documenting DR followed.
RESULTS: Six of the CVOTs evaluated DR. For the GLP1-RA class, there was no increase in the relative rate (rr) for retinopathy (rr = 1.09,95%CI; 0.925,1.289, p = 0.30), with only an increase with parenteral semaglutide (rr = 1.73; 1.10:2.71, p = 0.02). MR showed that decreases in A1c correlated with decreases in MACE (log rr = 0.364∗(Δ A1c), p = 0.014), but increases in DR (log rr= (-0.67∗(ΔA1c), p = 0.076). The change in DR was predominantly found for subcutaneous semaglutide given for >1 year (rr = 1.559,1.068,2.276, p = 0.022) and with decreases in A1c > 1.0% (rr = 1.59; 1.092,2.316, p = 0.016). For the class of GLP1-RA, the rate difference (rd) for worsening retinopathy was = 0.001 (and number needed to harm [NNH] = 1000) compared with rd for MACE = -0.013 (number needed to treat [NNT] = 77). The computation for semaglutide was NNH = 77 and NNT = 43.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis may assist in decisions balancing the relative risk (of existing retinopathy) versus benefits (to existing CVD). There should be close collaboration with ophthalmology to grade the baseline degree of retinopathy when initiating and following patients.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 36596264 ↗