Safety and effectiveness of dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice: 36 month post-marketing observational study.
J Diabetes Investig · 2023
Last updated 2026-05-28In a 36-month study of 3,136 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes taking dulaglutide 0.75 mg, 7.37% reported side effects, most commonly stomach issues (3.38%). Blood sugar control improved by an average of 0.76%, and participants lost an average of 1.6 kg. Side effects and improvements were slightly more common in patients aged 65 and older.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Diabetes Investig, 2023 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 4 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.49 |
| NIH percentile | 29 |
| Molecules | dulaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in the real-world setting in Japan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational post-marketing surveillance study was conducted for 36 months (July 2016 to July 2021) in Japan. Investigators reported data via an electronic data capture system. Data were analyzed by overall population and age group (<65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years).
RESULTS: The analysis population (N = 3,136) included 1,538 (49.04%), 869 (27.71%), and 729 (23.25%) patients aged <65 years, ≥65 to <75 years, and ≥75 years, respectively. Overall, 231 patients (7.37%) experienced ≥1 adverse drug reactions, with the highest frequency in the ≥75 years group. The most common adverse drug reactions were gastrointestinal disorders (n = 106; 3.38%). Severe hypoglycemia (n = 4; 0.13%), major adverse cardiovascular events (n = 4; 0.13%), and acute pancreatitis (n = 1; 0.03%) were uncommon. The mean glycated hemoglobin and bodyweight were reduced from baseline by -0.76% and -1.6 kg, respectively (last observation carried forward). The rate of dulaglutide continuation at 36 months was 58.03% overall and 59.43%, 63.13%, and 48.88% in the <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years groups, respectively. A factor analysis showed age ≥65 years was associated with a greater incidence of gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions as well as larger reductions in glycated hemoglobin and bodyweight.
CONCLUSIONS: The current real-world data are in accordance with clinical trial findings and further confirm the safety and effectiveness of dulaglutide for elderly patients, whose numbers were limited in the clinical trials.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 36367417 ↗
Related research
- Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
- Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial.
- Dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (AWARD-7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.
- Dulaglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
- Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3).
- Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5).