A phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of the biosimilar (RD12014) with liraglutide (Victoza) in healthy Chinese male subjects.
Clin Transl Sci · 2022
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 50 healthy Chinese men, a single 0.6 mg dose of the biosimilar drug RD12014 was compared to the reference drug liraglutide (Victoza). The study found that the two drugs had similar effects on the body, with 90% confidence intervals for key measurements falling within the 80-125% range. Side effects were reported by 22.4% of those taking RD12014 and 24.5% of those taking Victoza, and no immune responses to either drug were detected.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Clin Transl Sci, 2022 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 3 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.35 |
| NIH percentile | 21 |
| Molecules | liraglutide |
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar (RD12014) compared to reference liraglutide (Victoza) in healthy Chinese male subjects, so as to provide the basis for the similarity evaluation of the two drugs. Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to two sequences (RD12014-Victoza or Victoza-RD12014). Subjects received a single 0.6 mg dose of Victoza or RD12014 by abdominal subcutaneous injection during the first period. After a 7-day washout period, subjects received the alternative drug during the second period. Blood samples were collected at predefined timepoints for PKs and immunogenicity assessment. The primary PK end points were maximum plasma concentration (C ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC ). PK bioequivalence was achieved, if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of C and AUC were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. Safety was assessed throughout the study. The 90% CIs of the GMR of RD12014 to Victoza for C and AUC were completely within the range of 80.00-125.00%. Thirteen treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 11 subjects (22.4%) in the RD12014 group, compared to 12 TRAEs reported in 12 subjects (24.5%) in the Victoza group. The blood samples of 49 subjects were negative for anti-drug antibody and the neutralizing antibody was not further detected. This study demonstrated PK similarity of RD12014 to Victoza in healthy Chinese male subjects. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable between the two groups.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 35871497 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide.