Comparison of the effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on right and left ventricular myocardial deformation as shown by 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiograms.
Niger J Clin Pract · 2022
Last updated 2026-05-28In a six-month study of 27 people with type 2 diabetes, two treatments—exenatide and insulin glargine—were compared. Both drugs improved one heart measurement called TAPSE, while exenatide also improved right-ventricle strain and one left-ventricle strain measurement. No other heart function changes were seen, and the two treatments did not differ significantly from each other.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Niger J Clin Pract, 2022 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.06 |
| NIH percentile | 5 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs. The effects of GLP-1 analogs on myocardial function are controversial.
AIMS: The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on subclinical right and left ventricular dysfunction.
METHODS AND MATERIAL: In this study, 27 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized into exenatide and insulin glargine treatment groups. The patients were monitored for six months by conventional echocardiography (ECHO) and 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) to evaluate right and left ventricular functions.
RESULTS: ECHO parameters did not change significantly pre- and post-treatment, except for the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) values. Post-treatment TAPSE values significantly increased in both groups compared to pre-treatment values. In the insulin group, values for 2D-STE parameters of the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) based on apical long-axis (ALA) images increased significantly (p: 0.047) compared to pre-treatment values; however, apical 4-chamber (A4C), apical 2-chamber (A2C), LVGLS, and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) values did not change. In the exenatide group, LVGLS based on A4C values improved (p: 0.048), while ALA, A2C, and LVGLS values did not change. Moreover, the RVGLS values improved significantly after exenatide treatment (p: 0.002). Based on 2D-STE parameters the two treatments did not differ statistically in either pre- or post-treatment periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Glp-1 treatment can improve left ventricular regional and right ventricular global subclinical dysfunction. Therefore, early GLP-1 treatment may be recommended in diabetic patients with a high risk of cardiac dysfunction.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 35859471 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.