GLPwatch

Semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events regardless of metformin use: a post hoc subgroup analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6.

Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2022

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study looked at whether the diabetes drug semaglutide’s ability to reduce major heart-related events (like heart attacks or strokes) depends on whether patients were already taking metformin. In a combined analysis of two trials with 6,480 participants, semaglutide reduced heart risks by about 30% in those taking metformin and by about 14% in those not taking it, but the difference was not statistically significant. A broader review of seven trials with over 56,000 participants also found no meaningful difference in semaglutide’s heart benefits based on metformin use.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalCardiovasc Diabetol, 2022
Citations13
Relative citation ratio0.89
NIH percentile46
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) are conducted on a background of standard of care including metformin. These analyses sought to determine whether the cardiovascular (CV) effects of semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) vary according to baseline metformin use. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted using pooled SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 CVOT data in subjects with and without metformin use at baseline. Additionally, a trial-level meta-analysis was conducted using data from seven CVOTs with GLP-1RAs-SUSTAIN 6, PIONEER 6, HARMONY OUTCOMES, LEADER, REWIND, EXSCEL and AMPLITUDE-O-including adults with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk, and a primary endpoint of time to first major adverse CV event (MACE). RESULTS: In the post hoc analysis, the no-metformin subgroup was older, with a higher body mass index, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher CV risk at baseline vs the metformin subgroup. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the reduction in risk of MACE with semaglutide vs placebo in the metformin and no-metformin subgroups were 0.70 (0.55;0.89) and 0.86 (0.60;1.22), respectively. No significant interaction between the treatment effect on MACE and metformin subgroup was observed. Findings for other CV endpoints were similar. In the meta-analysis, treatment effect (GLP-1RA vs placebo) on CV outcomes was no different with vs without baseline metformin (overall ratio between the hazard ratios for metformin vs no-metformin 1.09 [0.96;1.22]). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the CV outcomes for semaglutide were similar regardless of baseline metformin use, which may also apply to all GLP-1RAs. Trial registration SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446), PIONEER 6 (NCT02692716).

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 35484580 ↗

Related research