Greater Adherence and Persistence with Injectable Dulaglutide Compared with Injectable Semaglutide at 1-Year Follow-up: Data from US Clinical Practice.
Clin Ther · 2022
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 26,284 matched pairs of adults with type 2 diabetes starting GLP-1 drugs, those taking dulaglutide were more likely to stick with their medication than those taking semaglutide. After 6 months, 63.4% of dulaglutide users were adherent compared to 47.8% of semaglutide users, and after 12 months, 54.4% vs 43.3%. Persistence on therapy was also higher for dulaglutide at both time points.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Clin Ther, 2022 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 19 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.51 |
| NIH percentile | 65 |
| Molecules | semaglutide, dulaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity |
Abstract
PURPOSE: Greater medication adherence and persistence have been associated with improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study compared adherence, persistence, and treatment patterns among patients naïve to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists initiating once-weekly injectable treatment with dulaglutide versus semaglutide over 6-month (6M) and 12-month (12M) follow-up periods.
METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study used administrative claims data from three IBM MarketScan research databases. Data from adult patients with type 2 diabetes newly initiating treatment with dulaglutide or semaglutide between January 2018 and January 2020 (index date was defined as the earliest fill date), without evidence of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use in the 6M baseline period, and with continuous enrollment in the 6M baseline and 6M or 12M follow-up period were included. Dulaglutide initiators were propensity score-matched, in a 1:1 ratio, to semaglutide initiators in each 6M and 12M follow-up cohort (26,284 and 13,837 pairs, respectively).
FINDINGS: In the matched cohorts, baseline characteristics were balanced; the mean age was 53 years, and 50% of patients were women. Compared to semaglutide initiators, dulaglutide initiators were more adherent (6M, 63.4% vs 47.8%; 12M, 54.4% vs 43.3%; both, P < 0.0001), more persistent on therapy (6M, 72% vs 62%, 12M, 55.5% vs 45.3%, both, P < 0.001), and had more mean days of persistence (6M, 145 vs 132, 12M, 254.3 vs 220.7; both, P < 0.001).
IMPLICATIONS: At both 6M and 12M follow-up, dulaglutide initiators had significantly greater adherence and greater persistence compared with matched semaglutide initiators.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 35264311 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.