GLPwatch

Benefit of insulin glargine/lixisenatide for reducing residual hyperglycaemia in Japan: Post hoc analysis of the LixiLan JP-O2 trial.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2021

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 26-week study of 521 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes, a combination treatment (iGlarLixi) reduced the percentage of people with poor blood sugar control despite normal fasting glucose levels from 19.6% to 8.1% compared to insulin glargine alone. The combination treatment also increased the proportion of participants achieving both target blood sugar levels (50.8% vs. 31.5%) and showed benefits across all age groups and whether or not they were taking a specific diabetes medication at the start.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2021
Citations4
Relative citation ratio0.27
NIH percentile17
Molecules lixisenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIM: To compare the benefits of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi), with insulin glargine (iGlar) for reducing residual hyperglycaemia (defined as HbA1c ≥ 7% despite fasting plasma glucose [FPG] < 130 mg/dL) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The open-label LixiLan JP-O2 study compared iGlarLixi with iGlar over 26 weeks in 521 people with T2D. This post hoc analysis assessed the proportions of participants with residual hyperglycaemia in the overall population, and in subgroups defined by age and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use at screening. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, significantly fewer participants had residual hyperglycaemia in the iGlarLixi versus the iGlar arm (8.1% vs. 19.6%; P = .0002). There was also less residual hyperglycaemia with iGlarLixi than iGlar in all subgroup analyses: 9.0% versus 16.8% in participants aged younger than 65 years (P = .0369); 6.5% versus 24.2% in participants aged 65 years or older (P = .0008); 10.1% versus 20.5% (P = .0202) in participants with DPP4i use; and 6.2% versus 18.8% in those without DPP4i use (P = .0024). The proportion reaching both HbA1c less than 7% and FPG less than 130 mg/dL was higher with iGlarLixi versus iGlar in the overall population (50.8% vs. 31.5%; P < .0001), and in all studied subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: iGlarLixi reduced the prevalence of residual hyperglycaemia in Japanese people with uncontrolled T2D compared with iGlar, both in the overall population and in subgroups defined by age and DPP4i use at screening.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 34472693 ↗

Related research