Real-world study on the effectiveness and safety of basal insulin IDegLira in type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with multi-injective insulin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Achieving glycemic target is paramount to control diabetes mellitus (DM) and reduce micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications. Despite the mostly recent-developed drugs, most patients still show an above desired glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level due to DM complex pathophysiology, therapeutic and dietary compliance and clinical inertia in introducing or intensifying insulin therapy. To support the promising results of clinical trials on the effectiveness and safety of the degludec/liraglutide combination (IDegLira) in type 2 DM patients with C-peptide values >1 ng/ml who were previously treated with basal-bolus multiple daily-dose insulin injections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, prospective and non-randomized trial enrolled type 2 DM patients referred to our outpatient clinic between January 2019 and December 2019, who were shifted from multiple daily-dose insulin injection therapy to degludec/liraglutide combination as per the physician's decision. The main assessment was HbA1c variation at 6 months from baseline. Secondary assessments included variation in fasting glycemia, routine anthropometric assessments, blood chemistry, blood pressure and patients' quality of life (measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ]), from baseline to 6 months. RESULTS: HbA1c (8.4 vs. 7.4%; p<0.0001) and body weight (94.1 vs. 93 kg; p<0.0001) were significantly lower after 6 months for patients on the degludec/liraglutide combination. A similar trend was observed in fasting glycemia levels (159 vs. 125 mg/dl; p<0.0001). An improved glycemic control was achieved with degludec/liraglutide despite a reduction in total daily insulin units (42 U at 6 months vs. 22 U at baseline; p<0.0001). In addition, higher scores in the DTSQ were registered after 6 months on degludec/liraglutide (mean score: 27 vs. 20; p<0.0001). The combination therapy also proved more convenient than basal-bolus therapy in terms of costs, with an average per-patient cost difference of €-0.41±0.59/die (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings show that degludec/liraglutide seems to be more effective than basal-bolus insulin in achieving glycemic control, allowing cost sustainability and improving patient satisfaction.