GLPwatch

Long-term efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide and the effect of switching from sitagliptin to oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 52-week, randomized, open-label extension of the PIONEER 7 trial.

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care · 2020

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 52-week extension of a trial, patients with type 2 diabetes who continued taking oral semaglutide maintained improvements in blood sugar control and lost an average of 3.7 kg. Those who switched from sitagliptin to oral semaglutide saw slightly better blood sugar control (-0.2% vs +0.1%) and lost 1.5 kg more weight than those who stayed on sitagliptin, though the blood sugar difference was not statistically significant. More patients on oral semaglutide reached target blood sugar levels (52.6% vs 28.6%) and needed less additional medication (9% vs 23.5%). The most common side effects with oral semaglutide were stomach-related.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalBMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020
Citations27
Relative citation ratio1.25
NIH percentile58
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The PIONEER 7 trial demonstrated superior glycemic control and weight loss with once-daily oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin 100 mg in type 2 diabetes. This 52-week extension evaluated long-term oral semaglutide treatment and switching from sitagliptin to oral semaglutide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 52-week, open-label extension commenced after the 52-week main phase. Patients on oral semaglutide in the main phase continued treatment (n=184; durability part); those on sitagliptin were rerandomized to continued sitagliptin (n=98) or oral semaglutide (n=100; initiated at 3 mg) (switch part). Oral semaglutide was dose-adjusted (3, 7, or 14 mg) every 8 weeks based on glycated hemoglobin (HbA) (target <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol)) and tolerability. Secondary endpoints (no primary) included changes in HbA and body weight. RESULTS: In the durability part, mean (SD) changes in HbA and body weight from week 0 were -1.5% (0.8) and -1.3% (1.0) and -2.8 kg (3.8) and -3.7 kg (5.2) at weeks 52 and 104, respectively. In the switch part, mean changes in HbA from week 52 to week 104 were -0.2% for oral semaglutide and 0.1% for sitagliptin (difference -0.3% (95% CI -0.6 to 0.0); p=0.0791 (superiority not confirmed)). More patients achieved HbA <7.0% with oral semaglutide (52.6%) than sitagliptin (28.6%; p=0.0011) and fewer received rescue medication (9% vs 23.5%). Respective mean changes in body weight were -2.4 kg and -0.9 kg (difference -1.5 kg (95% CI -2.8 to -0.1); p=0.0321). Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most commonly reported with oral semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment maintained HbA reductions, with additional body weight reductions, and was well tolerated. Switching from sitagliptin to flexibly dosed oral semaglutide maintained HbA reductions, helped more patients achieve HbA targets with less use of additional glucose-lowering medication, and offers the potential for additional reductions in body weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02849080.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 33318068 ↗

Related research