GLPwatch

The cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 Diabetes: a systematic literature review.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res · 2021

Last updated 2026-05-28

A review of 19 studies found that once-weekly semaglutide, a GLP-1 drug for type 2 diabetes, was compared to other similar drugs in terms of cost-effectiveness. The studies included 8 short-term and 11 long-term analyses, but the review noted that the heart-related benefits of semaglutide may not have been fully captured in these evaluations.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2021
Citations12
Relative citation ratio0.85
NIH percentile45
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

: As a novel glucagon-like peptide-1receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment, the economic value of once-weekly semaglutide had been assessed in several country settings. The authors' objective was to systematically review the existing pharmacoeconomic literature evaluating the cost-effectiveness associated with once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 RAs and provide implications for further researches.: We conducted a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) published up to 25 July 2020 in PubMed, web of science, and the ISPOR presentation database, compared once-weekly semaglutide with other GLP-1 RAs in T2D. Nineteen studies were identified, including 8 short-term and 11 long-term studies. General characteristics and main results of the included studies were summarized.: This review provided references for other countries to overview the value of once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 RAs in T2D in the healthcare decision-making process and to conduct their CEA studies associated with once-weekly semaglutide. The authors found that the cardiovascular (CV) benefit of once-weekly semaglutide was under-estimated in current studies and suggested that the methods of economic evaluations for novel anti-diabetic drugs with CV benefit should be improved in future researches.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 33317348 ↗

Related research