Impact of patient characteristics on efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide: SUSTAIN 7 <i>post hoc</i> analyses.
BMJ Open · 2020
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 1,199 people with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly semaglutide led to greater improvements in blood sugar control and weight loss compared to dulaglutide after 40 weeks. These benefits were seen across different groups, including age, sex, diabetes duration, blood sugar levels, and body weight categories. More people on semaglutide also reached blood sugar targets and lost at least 5% or 10% of their body weight. Gastrointestinal side effects were the most common but were more frequent in women and decreased with higher body weight in those taking semaglutide.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | BMJ Open, 2020 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 16 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.76 |
| NIH percentile | 41 |
| Molecules | semaglutide, dulaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In SUSTAIN 7, once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated haemoglobin (HbA) and body weight (BW) reductions versus once-weekly dulaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This analysis investigated the impact of clinically relevant subject characteristics on treatment effects of semaglutide versus dulaglutide.
DESIGN: Analyses by baseline age (<65, ≥65 years), sex (male, female), diabetes duration (≤5, >5-10, >10 years), HbA (≤7.5, >7.5-8.5, >8.5% (≤58, >58-69, >69 mmol/mol)) and body mass index (BMI) (<30, 30-<35, ≥35 kg/m).
SETTING: 194 sites; 16 countries.
PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with T2D (n=1199) exposed to treatment.
INTERVENTIONS: Semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (low-dose comparison); semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg (high-dose comparison), all subcutaneously once weekly.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in HbA (primary endpoint) and BW (confirmatory secondary endpoint) from baseline to week 40; proportion of subjects achieving HbA targets (<7%, ≤6.5% (<53, ≤48 mmol/mol)) and weight-loss responses (≥5%, ≥10%) at week 40; and safety.
RESULTS: HbA and BW reductions (estimated treatment difference ranges: -0.22 to -0.70%-point; -1.76 to -3.84 kg) and proportion of subjects achieving HbA targets and weight-loss responses were statistically significantly greater for the majority of comparisons of semaglutide versus dulaglutide within each subgroup category and, excepting glycaemic control within the low-dose comparison in HbA subgroups, this was irrespective of subgroup or dose comparison. Gastrointestinal adverse events, the most common with both treatments, were reported by more women than men and, with semaglutide, decreased with increasing BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: Consistently greater improvements in HbA and BW with semaglutide versus dulaglutide, regardless of age, sex, diabetes duration, glycaemic control and BMI, support the efficacy of semaglutide across the continuum of care in a heterogeneous population with T2D.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02648204.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 33199417 ↗
Related research
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
- Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
- Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes.
- A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.
- Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.