GLPwatch

Efficacy and safety of exenatide as add-on therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes with an intensive insulin regimen: A randomized double-blind trial.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2021

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 6-month study of 46 people with type 2 diabetes mostly using insulin pumps, those who added twice-daily injections of exenatide saw their blood sugar control (HbA1c) drop by 0.62% compared to a 0.08% change in the placebo group. The exenatide group also lost an average of 2.55 kg in weight, while the placebo group gained 1.29 kg, and their post-dinner blood sugar was 96.7 mg/dL lower than the placebo group.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2021
Citations9
Relative citation ratio0.57
NIH percentile32
Molecules exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of the short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide on a population of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) mostly treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin injection (CSII). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phase 2/3, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) injections of exenatide (10 μg BID) or matched placebo. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with T2D and elevated HbA1c were randomized (42% of the planned sample size): exenatide (n = 28) and placebo (n = 18). CSII treatment was used by 75% and 89% of patients of the exenatide and placebo groups, respectively. At 6 months, the change in HbA1c was -0.62% ± 0.94% and 0.08% ± 0.81% in the exenatide and placebo groups, respectively (difference, -0.70%; 95% CI [-1.24%; -0.15%], P = .014); body weight and body mass index decreased in the exenatide group (-2.55 ± 3.25 kg and -1.00 ± 1.31 kg/m ) and increased in the placebo group (1.29 ± 2.82 kg and 0.46 ± 1.16 kg/m ) (observed difference, -3.85 and -1.45, respectively, both P < .001); the postdinner capillary blood glucose value was lower in the exenatide group compared with the placebo group (162.4 ± 80.5 vs. 259.1 ± 94.4 mg/dL, respectively; observed difference, -96.7, P < .01). Hypoglycaemic risk, quality of life and overall safety were not different between the groups, apart from the expected occurrence of digestive effects in the exenatide group. CONCLUSIONS: Although we failed to reach our planned sample size, the addition of exenatide treatment 10 μg BID SC in T2D patients with uncontrolled HbA1c despite an intensified insulin regimen, resulted in a significant reduction of HbA1c and body weight with a good overall safety profile and acceptance.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 33043591 ↗

Related research