Comparative effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide in Asian type 2 diabetes patients: a multi-institutional cohort study and meta-analysis.
Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2020
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 1,512 Asian type 2 diabetes patients taking dulaglutide and 1,513 taking liraglutide, both drugs improved blood sugar control over 12 months, but dulaglutide lowered HbA1c by 1.06% compared to 0.83% with liraglutide—a difference of 0.23%. Both drugs also reduced weight, liver enzyme levels, and kidney function markers, while only dulaglutide significantly lowered systolic blood pressure by 2.47 mmHg. Changes in weight, blood pressure, and liver and kidney function between the two drugs were not significantly different.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2020 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 14 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.72 |
| NIH percentile | 39 |
| Molecules | liraglutide, dulaglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Head-to-head comparison of clinical effectiveness between dulaglutide and liraglutide in Asia is limited. This study was aimed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by utilizing multi-institutional electronic medical records to identify real-world type 2 diabetes patients treated with dulaglutide or liraglutide during 2016-2018 in Taiwan and followed up until 2019. Effectiveness outcomes were assessed at every 3 months in the 1-year follow-up. Propensity score techniques were applied to enhance between-group comparability. Significant differences in changes of effectiveness outcomes between treatment groups during the follow-up were examined and further analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures approaches.
RESULTS: A total of 1512 subjects receiving dulaglutide and 1513 subjects receiving liraglutide were identified. At 12 months, significant HbA1c changes from baseline were found in both treatments (dulaglutide: - 1.06%, p < 0.001; liraglutide: - 0.83%, p < 0.001), with a significant between-group difference (- 0.23%, 95% confidence interval - 0.38 to - 0.08%, p < 0.01). Both treatments yielded significant declines in weight, alanine aminotransferase level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline (dulaglutide: - 1.14 kg, - 3.08 U/L and - 2.08 mL/min/1.73 m, p < 0.01; liraglutide: - 1.64 kg, - 3.65 U/L and - 2.33 mL/min/1.73 m, p < 0.001), whereas only dulaglutide yielded a significant systolic blood pressure reduction (- 2.47 mmHg, p < 0.001). Between-group differences in changes of weight, blood pressure, and liver and renal functions at 12 months were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In real-world T2D patients, dulaglutide versus liraglutide was associated with better glycemic control and comparable effects on changes of weight, blood pressure, and liver and renal functions.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 33036617 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.