GLPwatch

Combination therapy with pioglitazone/exenatide improves beta-cell function and produces superior glycaemic control compared with basal/bolus insulin in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A 3-year follow-up of the Qatar study.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2020

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 3-year study of 331 people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, those who took pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide saw their blood sugar control improve more than those who took basal/bolus insulin (-1.1% vs. a smaller decrease in HbA1c). A larger share of the combination therapy group (86%) reached the target HbA1c of less than 7.0% compared to the insulin group (44%). Combination therapy also improved insulin production 2.5 times more than insulin therapy and caused less weight gain and fewer low blood sugar events.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2020
Citations17
Relative citation ratio0.74
NIH percentile40
Molecules exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIM: To examine the long-term efficacy of thiazolidinedione plus a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist versus basal-bolus insulin on glycaemic control and beta-cell function in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin plus sulphonylurea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-one patients with poorly controlled T2D were recruited over 3 years and were followed for an additional year. Subjects received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at baseline and at study end. After completing the baseline OGTT, subjects were randomized to receive either pioglitazone plus weekly exenatide (combination therapy) or basal/bolus insulin (insulin therapy) to maintain an HbA1c of less than 7.0%. The primary outcome of the study was the difference in HbA1c at study end between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Both therapies caused a robust decrease in HbA1c. However, combination therapy caused a greater decrement (-1.1%, P < .0001) than insulin therapy, and more subjects in the combination therapy group (86%) achieved the American Diabetes Association goal of glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7.0%) than those in the insulin therapy group (44%) (P < .0001). Both therapies improved insulin secretion. However, the improvement in insulin secretion with combination therapy was 2.5-fold greater (P < .001) than with insulin therapy (50%). Insulin therapy caused more weight gain and hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSION: Both combination therapy and insulin therapy effectively reduced HbA1c in poorly controlled T2D on multiple oral agents. However, combination therapy produced a greater improvement in insulin secretion and decrease in HbA1c with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 32729222 ↗

Related research