Predictive factors associated with glycaemic response to exenatide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
J Clin Pharm Ther · 2020
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of 148 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes taking exenatide twice daily, 92 (62%) saw their blood sugar control improve by at least 1% after 6 months, while 56 (38%) did not. Those with higher starting blood sugar levels (≥7.4%) and a shorter diabetes history (≤15 years) were more likely to respond, while those with lower starting blood sugar (<7.4%) and a longer diabetes history (>15 years) were less likely to respond.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Clin Pharm Ther, 2020 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 7 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.33 |
| NIH percentile | 20 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Exenatide is widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) because of its established effect on lowering glucose and promotion of weight loss. However, therapeutic response to exenatide varies considerably among patients with T2DM. The purpose of this study was to determine which variables can predict the response to exenatide and to individualize specific therapies for patients with T2DM who need treatment with exenatide.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with T2DM who were treated with exenatide twice daily as a part of their diabetes care for at least 12 months. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on glycaemic response to exenatide use: responders and non-responders.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred forty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria; among them, 92 responded with an HbA1C reduction ≥1.0% from baseline HbA1C and 56 did not respond to exenatide after 6 months of exenatide treatment. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline HbA1C and duration of diabetes were identified as predictors of HbA1C reduction ≥1% at 6 months (P < .05). Linear regression analysis further identified that patients with a higher baseline HbA1C (≥7.4%) and shorter duration of diabetes (≤15.0 years) were likely to respond to exenatide, whereas those with a lower baseline HbA1C (<7.4%) and longer duration of diabetes (>15.0 years) were not likely to respond to exenatide.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that T2DM patients with a higher baseline HbA1C and a shorter duration of diabetes are more likely to have a glycaemic response to exenatide than those with a lower baseline HbA1C and a longer duration of diabetes. The identification of predictors of therapeutic response to exenatide can provide clinically useful information for characterizing the patients who could receive the greatest benefit from exenatide.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 32176827 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.