GLPwatch

Efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes Metab Res Rev · 2020

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a 24-week study of 76 people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease, those who took exenatide saw a 17.55% drop in liver fat, a 43.57 cm³ reduction in visceral fat, and a 0.10-point drop in a liver scarring score, while those on insulin glargine had a 10.49% drop in liver fat only. Exenatide also lowered body weight, waist size, blood sugar after meals, and harmful cholesterol more than insulin glargine, and reduced liver enzymes more. Side effects were similar between the two groups.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Metab Res Rev, 2020
Citations97
Relative citation ratio5.25
NIH percentile93
Molecules exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Mash

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: We performed a 24-week randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial. Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive exenatide or insulin glargine treatment. The endpoints included changes in liver fat content (LFC), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, blood glucose, liver enzymes, lipid profile, body weight, and Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). RESULTS: LFC, VAT, SAT, and FIB-4 were significantly reduced after exenatide treatment (ΔLFC, -17.55 ± 12.93%; ΔVAT, -43.57 ± 68.20 cm ; ΔSAT, -28.44 ± 51.48 cm ; ΔFIB-4, -0.10 ± 0.26; all P < .05). In comparison, only LFC (ΔLFC, -10.49 ± 11.38%; P < .05), and not VAT, SAT, or FIB-4 index (all P > .05), was reduced after insulin glargine treatment. Moreover, exenatide treatment resulted in greater reductions in alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) than insulin glargine (P < 0.05). The body weight, waist circumference, postprandial plasma glucose, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the exenatide group also presented greater reductions than the insulin glargine group (P < .05). The proportion of adverse events were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced LFC in patients with drug-naive T2DM and NAFLD; however, exenatide showed greater reductions in body weight, visceral fat area, liver enzymes, FIB-4, postprandial plasma glucose, and LDL-C.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 31955491 ↗

Related research