GLPwatch

Prediction and validation of exenatide risk marker effects on progression of renal disease: Insights from EXSCEL.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2020

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of people with type 2 diabetes taking exenatide, researchers found that after 6 months, blood sugar control, weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels improved compared to those taking a placebo. They also saw fewer cases of early kidney damage. Using these short-term changes, their prediction model estimated an 11% lower risk of kidney decline or failure, which closely matched the actual 12% reduction observed in the study.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2020
Citations14
Relative citation ratio0.54
NIH percentile31
Molecules exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction, Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract

AIM: To assess whether the previously developed multivariable risk prediction framework (PRE score) could predict the renal effects observed in the EXSCEL cardiovascular outcomes trial using short-term changes in cardio-renal risk markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changes from baseline to 6 months in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), haemoglobin, total cholesterol, and new micro- or macroalbuminuria were evaluated. The renal outcomes were defined as a composite of a sustained 30% or 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Relationships between risk markers and long-term renal outcomes were determined in patients with type 2 diabetes from the ALTITUDE study using multivariable Cox regression analysis, and then applied to short-term changes in risk markers observed in EXSCEL to predict the exenatide-induced impact on renal outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, mean HbA1c, BMI, SBP and total cholesterol were lower at 6 months with exenatide, as was the incidence of new microalbuminuria. The PRE score predicted a relative risk reduction for the 30% eGFR decline + ESRD endpoint of 11.3% (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.94), compared with 12.7% (HR 0.87; 0.77-0.99) observed risk reduction. For the 40% eGFR decline + ESRD endpoint, the predicted and observed risk reductions were 11.0% (HR 0.89; 0.82-0.97) and 13.7% (HR 0.86, 0.72-1.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating short-term risk marker changes into a multivariable risk score predicted the magnitude of renal risk reduction observed in EXSCEL.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 31912603 ↗

Related research