A Pilot Study of Exenatide Actions in Alzheimer's Disease.
Curr Alzheimer Res · 2019
Last updated 2026-05-28In an 18-month study of 21 people with early Alzheimer’s disease, the GLP-1 drug exenatide was safe and well-tolerated, though it caused more nausea and reduced appetite than a placebo. Exenatide did not improve clinical symptoms, thinking abilities, brain volume, or most blood and spinal-fluid markers compared to placebo, except for a reduction in a specific Alzheimer’s-related protein (Aβ42) found in nerve-cell particles in the blood. The study was stopped early and included too few participants to draw firm conclusions.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Curr Alzheimer Res, 2019 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 125 |
| Relative citation ratio | 6.10 |
| NIH percentile | 94 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
| Conditions studied | Alzheimers |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Strong preclinical evidence suggests that exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP- 1) receptor agonist used for treating type 2 diabetes, is neuroprotective and disease-modifying in Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
OBJECTIVE: We performed an 18-month double-blind randomized placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial to assess the safety and tolerability of exenatide and explore treatment responses for clinical, cognitive, and biomarker outcomes in early AD.
METHOD: Eighteen participants with high probability AD based on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers completed the entire study prior to its early termination by the sponsor; partial outcomes were available for twentyone.
RESULTS: Exenatide was safe and well-tolerated, showing an expectedly higher incidence of nausea and decreased appetite compared to placebo and decreasing glucose and GLP-1 during Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests. Exenatide treatment produced no differences or trends compared to placebo for clinical and cognitive measures, MRI cortical thickness and volume, or biomarkers in CSF, plasma, and plasma neuronal extracellular vesicles (EV) except for a reduction of Aβ42 in EVs.
CONCLUSION: The positive finding of lower EV Aβ42 supports emerging evidence that plasma neuronal EVs provide an effective platform for demonstrating biomarker responses in clinical trials in AD. The study was underpowered due to early termination and therefore we cannot draw any firm conclusions. However, the analysis of secondary outcomes shows no trends in support of the hypothesis that exenatide is diseasemodifying in clinical AD, and lowering EV Aβ42 in and of itself may not improve cognitive outcomes in AD.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 31518224 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.