GLPwatch

Post hoc efficacy and safety analysis of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed- ratio combination in North American patients compared with the rest of world.

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care · 2019

Last updated 2026-05-28

In two studies with a total of 1,898 participants, a combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) improved blood sugar control more than either insulin glargine or lixisenatide alone, with reductions in HbA1c of up to 0.84% in North American patients and 0.69% in patients from the rest of the world. The combination also led to weight loss of about 1.6 kg in North American patients and 1.3 kg in others, while rates of low blood sugar and stomach-related side effects were similar between groups.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalBMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2019
Citations2
Relative citation ratio0.10
NIH percentile8
Molecules lixisenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi (titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine (iGlar) and lixisenatide) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) living in North America (NA; USA and Canada) compared with the rest of the world (RoW). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis included patient-level data from 509 sites/centers across two phase III trials: LixiLan-O (NCT02058147; insulin-naive patients; NA, n=371; RoW, n=796) and LixiLan-L (NCT02058160; inadequately controlled patients on basal insulin; NA, n=196; RoW, n=535). Efficacy outcomes were: change from baseline to Week 30 in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose (PPG), PPG excursions, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight; proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <42 mmol/mol (<7.0%); proportion of patients achieving composite endpoint: HbA1c <42 mmol/mol (<7.0%), no weight gain or symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L (≤70 mg/dL)). Safety endpoints included incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. RESULTS: Significantly larger reductions (p≤0.003) in HbA1c from baseline to Week 30 were achieved with iGlarLixi, compared with iGlar or lixisenatide, in NA and RoW patients in LixiLan-O (iGlarLixi vs iGlar: -0.31 and -0.29, respectively; iGlarLixi vs lixisenatide: -0.84 and -0.69, respectively) and in LixiLan-L (iGlarLixi vs iGlar: -0.5 and -0.51, respectively). Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was similar between NA and RoW patients. iGlarLixi resulted in significant weight benefits versus iGlar (change from baseline -1.58 and -1.29 kg for NA and RoW patients, respectively; p0.001). GI adverse events were similar for iGlarLixi and iGlar, but significantly higher for lixisenatide. CONCLUSIONS: iGlarLixi improved glycemic parameters versus iGlar or lixisenatide alone in both NA and RoW patients, with beneficial weight effects versus iGlar. iGlarLixi treatment responses, hypoglycemia risk and GI adverse events in NA patients were comparable with patients in the RoW. TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02058147 and NCT02058160.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 31114694 ↗

Related research