GLPwatch

Quantifying the Value of Orally Delivered Biologic Therapies: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Semaglutide.

J Pharm Sci · 2019

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study compared the cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide (a daily capsule) to other forms of semaglutide, including weekly injections. The oral capsule was found to be cost-effective despite requiring a much higher dose (about 100 times more) and more frequent use than the injection. The analysis suggests that the benefits of taking a daily capsule—such as improved quality of life—outweigh the extra production costs compared to weekly injections.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalJ Pharm Sci, 2019
Citations33
Relative citation ratio1.80
NIH percentile70
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Abstract

Oral semaglutide, which has undergone multiple phase 3 clinical trials, represents the first oral biologic medication for type 2 diabetes in the form of a daily capsule. It provides similar efficacy compared with its weekly injection counterpart, but it demands a dose on the order of 100 times as high and requires more frequent administration. We perform a cost effectiveness analysis using a first and second order Monte Carlo simulation to estimate quality-adjusted life expectancies associated with an oral daily capsule, oral weekly capsule, daily injection, and weekly injection of semaglutide. We conclude that the additional costs incurred to produce extra semaglutide for the oral formulation are cost effective, given the greater quality of life experienced when taking a capsule over a weekly injection. We also demonstrate that the potency of semaglutide allows the formulation to be cost effective, and less potent drugs will require increased oral bioavailability to make a cost effective oral formulation.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 31034907 ↗

Related research