GLPwatch

Effects of Dulaglutide and Insulin Glargine on Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Real-world Setting.

Clin Ther · 2018

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a real-world study of 1222 people with type 2 diabetes starting dulaglutide and 13,869 starting insulin glargine, fewer dulaglutide users had severe kidney problems at the start (0.9% vs 4.1% with eGFR between 15–30, and 0.1% vs 1.2% with eGFR below 15). Over one year, dulaglutide users saw a smaller drop in kidney function (-0.4 vs -0.9 mL/min/1.73 m) and a larger improvement in blood sugar control (-0.5% vs -0.2% in HbA).

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalClin Ther, 2018
Citations5
Relative citation ratio0.18
NIH percentile12
Molecules dulaglutide
Conditions studied Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to use real-world treatment results to compare changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA) among patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with dulaglutide or insulin glargine and to determine the proportions of patients with renal impairment who initiate each treatment. METHODS: The study used data from the Practice Fusion electronic health records database from October 2013 through June 2017. Adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated dulaglutide or insulin glargine therapy and had multiple recorded serum creatinine and/or HbA laboratory test results were included in the study. The dulaglutide cohort (n = 1222) was matched to the insulin glargine cohort (n = 13,869) using Mahalanobis distance matching with propensity score calipers. Multivariable analyses of the matched cohorts of individuals with serum creatinine results (n = 1183 dulaglutide and 1183 insulin glargine) examined the association between intent-to-treat therapy and changes in eGFR. In addition, multivariable analyses were also conducted on a subset of these patients who also had recorded HbA tests (n = 1088 dulaglutide and 1088 insulin glargine) to examine the association between changes in HbA during the 1 year postperiod. FINDINGS: Among patients who initiated dulaglutide therapy, only 0.9% of patients had an index eGFR <30 and ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m and 0.1% had an index eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m. In contrast, 4.1% of insulin glargine-treated patients had an index eGFR <30 and ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m and 1.2% had an index eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m. Compared with patients who initiated therapy with insulin glargine, initiation of dulaglutide therapy was associated with a significantly smaller decrease in eGFR (-0.4 vs -0.9 mL/min/1.73 m; P = 0.0024), a significantly smaller likelihood of having a 30% or greater reduction in eGFR (3.3% vs 4.1%; P < 0.0001), and a significantly larger reduction in HbA (-0.5% vs -0.2%; P < 0.0001). IMPLICATIONS: In clinical practice, the use of dulaglutide was relatively more limited in patients with a higher degree of renal impairment compared with use of insulin glargine. However, initiation of dulaglutide therapy, compared with insulin glargine therapy, was associated with a significantly smaller decrease in eGFR and a larger reduction in HbA during the 1 year postperiod.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 30093131 ↗

Related research