GLPwatch

Reply to the comment of Wilbrink et al. on Retrospective analysis of liraglutide and basal insulin combination therapy in Japanese type 2 diabetes: The association between remaining β-cell function and the achievement of the HbA1c target 1 year after initiation.

J Diabetes Investig · 2018

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study found that the effectiveness of liraglutide combined with basal insulin in lowering blood sugar depends on the remaining function of beta cells, with a specific measure (CPI) of 1.103 or higher needed to reach a target blood sugar level (HbA1c below 7.0%) after one year. Another study by Wilbrink et al. suggested that liraglutide's effects depend on how long someone has had type 2 diabetes, but this was not observed in the current study, possibly due to differences in study design, participant numbers (38 vs. 69), or ethnic factors.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalJ Diabetes Investig, 2018
Citations1
Relative citation ratio0.05
NIH percentile5
Molecules liraglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

We have reported that the HbA1c-lowering effects of liraglutide/basal insulin combination rely on remaining β-cell function and that the cut-off value of the C-peptide immunoreactivity index (CPI), a β-cell function-related index frequently used in Japanese clinical settings, is 1.103 for the achievement of HbA1c <7.0% at 54 weeks after initiating the liraglutide/basal insulin combination. Wilbrink et al claimed that glucose-lowering effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide depend of duration of type 2 diabetes; while our resent study published in the Journal of Diabetes Investigation failed to detect such dependency. This discrepancy might be due to several reasons including co-administration of basal insulin with liraglutide in our study; ethnic difference in T2D pathophysiology between the two study; and difference in sample size (The Usui study on liraglutide/basal insulin, n = 38; the Usui study on liraglutide monotherapy or SU combination, n=88; and the Wilbrink study, n = 69).

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29974670 ↗

Related research