New antihyperglycaemic agents and cardiovascular disease: let's be optimistic.
Curr Opin Cardiol · 2018
Last updated 2026-05-28A review of recent studies found that GLP-1 receptor agonists (like liraglutide and semaglutide) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (like empagliflozin and canagliflozin) improved multiple heart disease risk factors, including blood sugar control, body weight, and blood pressure. In large trials, these drugs reduced the risk of major heart events—such as heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular death—by about 12% to 26% compared to placebos.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Curr Opin Cardiol, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 4 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.16 |
| NIH percentile | 11 |
| Molecules | — |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Reduction |
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) substantially increases mortality in diabetes mellitus. This narrative review highlights recent research on the putative associations between dipeptyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and several cardiovascular risk factors.
RECENT FINDINGS: New antihyperglycaemic agents favourably modulate several CVD risk factors, including fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels, body weight, blood pressure, lipids, microalbuminuria, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, serum uric acid, and arterial stiffness. Liraglutide (in LEADER), semaglutide (in SUSTAIN-6), empagliflozin (in EMPA-REG OUTCOME), and canagliflozin (in CANVAS) were all associated with reduction of the primary composite outcome (i.e. cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke). Of note, patients at higher CVD risk, with optimally controlled CVD risk factors seem to benefit more.
SUMMARY: Recent trials with SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs show superiority in CVD event reduction as opposed to only noninferiority. It is still unclear if the results can be generalised to the lower risk population with diabetes but without CVD. Head-to-head comparison and CVD outcome trials involving combination of these two drug classes are also expected to facilitate decision making in clinical practice.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29702499 ↗