GLPwatch

Semaglutide as a therapeutic option for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Pooled analysis of the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2018

Last updated 2026-05-28

In clinical trials with 3,045 non-elderly and 854 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) reduced blood sugar control by 1.2% to 1.9% compared to 0% to 1.0% with other treatments. Both age groups also lost similar amounts of weight, and side effects were roughly equal, though more elderly patients stopped treatment early. Severe low blood sugar events were not more common with semaglutide than with other treatments.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2018
Citations53
Relative citation ratio2.15
NIH percentile76
Molecules semaglutide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of semaglutide vs comparators in non-elderly (<65 years) and elderly (≥65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials were evaluated. Patients were randomized to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) vs placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide or insulin. The primary objective was change in HbA1c and secondary objectives were changes in body weight and safety. Mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 1.2%-1.5% and 1.5%-1.9% vs 0%-0.9% (non-elderly, n = 3045) and by 1.3%-1.5% and 1.2%-1.8% vs 0.2%-1.0% (elderly, n = 854) with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg vs comparators. Similar reductions from baseline in mean body weight with semaglutide occurred in both age groups. Similar proportions of patients experienced adverse events; premature treatment discontinuations were higher in elderly vs non-elderly patients. No increased risk of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia was seen with semaglutide vs comparators between age groups. Semaglutide had a comparable efficacy and safety profile in non-elderly and elderly patients across the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials, making it an effective treatment option for elderly patients with T2D.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29687620 ↗

Related research