What have we learnt from "real world" data, observational studies and meta-analyses.
Diabetes Obes Metab · 2018
Last updated 2026-05-28GLP-1 drugs like liraglutide and semaglutide are now commonly used for type 2 diabetes, either alone or with insulin. Large studies show they help control blood sugar and are generally safe, with some evidence they may also reduce major heart problems. Real-world data supports their effectiveness and reassures that risks like pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer are not major concerns.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Obes Metab, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 33 |
| Relative citation ratio | 1.36 |
| NIH percentile | 61 |
| Molecules | — |
Abstract
The incretin therapies glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors are now well-established as second and third-line therapies and in combination with insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Over the last decade, there is accumulating evidence of their efficacy and safety from both large multicentre randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies. Cardiovascular outcome trials have confirmed that several of these agents are also non-inferior to placebo with the GLP-1 RA liraglutide and semaglutide recently found to be superior in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events. Observational studies and post-marketing surveillance provide real world evidence of safety and effectiveness of these agents and have provided reassurance that signals for pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer seen in clinical trials are not of major concern in large patient populations. Well-designed real world studies complement RCTs and systematic reviews but appropriate data and methodologies, which are constantly improving, are necessary to answer appropriate clinical questions relating to the use of incretin therapies.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29364585 ↗