An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin.
J Med Econ · 2018
Last updated 2026-05-28In patients with type 2 diabetes whose blood sugar control was not adequate on basal insulin alone, IDegLira led to a 0.44% greater reduction in blood sugar control (measured by HbA) and a 1.42 kg greater reduction in body weight compared to iGlarLixi. The rate of severe or very low blood sugar episodes was about half as common with IDegLira, though the rate of slightly less severe low blood sugar episodes was similar between the two treatments.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Med Econ, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 23 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.94 |
| NIH percentile | 48 |
| Molecules | liraglutide, lixisenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
AIMS: To obtain estimates of the relative treatment effects between insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and insulin glargine U100/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on basal insulin therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from phase 3 trials providing evidence for estimating the relative efficacy and safety of IDegLira vs iGlarLixi in patients uncontrolled on basal insulin-only regimens were used in this analysis. Outcomes of interest were changes in HbA, body weight and insulin dose, and rate ratio of hypoglycemia. The indirect comparison of the reported trial findings followed the principles of Bucher et al.
RESULTS: IDegLira was estimated to provide a 0.44 [95% CI = 0.17-0.71] %-point reduction in HbA compared with iGlarLixi. Body weight was reduced by 1.42 [95% CI = 0.35-2.50] kg with IDegLira compared with iGlarLixi. Insulin dose was comparable between the two interventions. The rate of severe or blood glucose-confirmed (self-measured plasma glucose [SMPG] ≤ 3.1 mmol/L) hypoglycemia with IDegLira was approximately half that of iGlarLixi (rate ratio = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.29-0.90]). However, using the American Diabetes Association definition of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (SMPG ≤3.9 mmol/L) the rate was comparable between the two treatments (rate ratio = 1.07 [95% CI = 0.90-1.28]).
LIMITATIONS: The assumptions made in the indirect comparison and differences between the included trials in baseline HbA levels, previous use of sulfonylureas, definitions of hypoglycemia, presence or absence of run-in period, the different duration of the trials, and the cross-over design of one of the trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this indirect treatment comparison demonstrate that, among patients with T2DM uncontrolled on basal insulin, treatment with IDegLira results in a greater reduction of HbA and a greater reduction in body weight compared with iGlarLixi at similar insulin doses.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29164973 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.