GLPwatch

Cost Effectiveness of Exenatide Once Weekly Versus Insulin Glargine and Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.

Clin Drug Investig · 2018

Last updated 2026-05-28

A study in Greece compared the long-term cost-effectiveness of exenatide once weekly (ExQW) to insulin glargine (IG) and liraglutide 1.2 mg (Lira1.2mg) for adults with type 2 diabetes not well-controlled by oral drugs. Over a lifetime, ExQW provided slightly more quality-adjusted life-years (0.458 vs. IG and 0.039 vs. Lira1.2mg) at additional costs of €2061 compared to IG and €110 compared to Lira1.2mg. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was €4499 for ExQW vs. IG and €2827 for ExQW vs. Lira1.2mg.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalClin Drug Investig, 2018
Citations11
Relative citation ratio0.69
NIH percentile38
Molecules liraglutide, exenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of exenatide once weekly (ExQW) versus insulin glargine (IG) or liraglutide 1.2 mg (Lira1.2mg) for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not adequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy in Greece. METHODS: The published and validated Cardiff Diabetes Model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes over a patient's lifetime. Clinical data were retrieved from a head-to-head clinical trial (DURATION 3) and a published network meta-analysis comparing ExQW with IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively. Following a Greek third-party payer perspective, direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, consumables, developed micro- and macrovascular complications, maintenance treatment, as well as treatment-related adverse events were considered. Cost and utility data were extracted from literature and publicly available official sources and assigned to model parameters to calculate total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data. RESULTS: Over a patient's lifetime, ExQW was associated with 0.458 or 0.039 incremental QALYs compared with IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively, at additional costs of €2061 or €110, respectively. The ICER for ExQW was €4499/QALY compared with IG and €2827/QALY compared with Lira1.2mg. Results were robust across various one-way and scenario analyses. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €36,000/QALY, probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ExQW had a 100 or 88.2% probability of being cost effective relative to IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ExQW was estimated to be cost effective relative to IG or Lira1.2mg for the treatment of T2DM in adults not adequately controlled on OAD therapy in Greece.

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 29080210 ↗

Related research