Safety and efficacy of the combination of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide with an oral antidiabetic drug in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized, 52-week, open-label, parallel-group trial.
J Diabetes Investig · 2018
Last updated 2026-05-28In a 52-week study of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, adding liraglutide (0.9 mg/day) to an existing oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) led to a slightly greater reduction in blood sugar control compared to adding another OAD. The rates of side effects were similar between the two groups, with minor hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) being rare in both. The improvement in blood sugar control with liraglutide ranged from a 0.14% to 0.44% greater reduction compared to adding another OAD.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | J Diabetes Investig, 2018 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 5 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.21 |
| NIH percentile | 14 |
| Molecules | liraglutide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present post-hoc analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide in combination with one oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) across different OAD classes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis using data from a 52-week, open-label, parallel-group trial, in which patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a single OAD (α-glucosidase inhibitor, glinide, metformin or thiazolidinedione) were randomized to either pretrial OAD in combination with liraglutide 0.9 mg/day (liraglutide group) or pretrial OAD in combination with an additional OAD (additional OAD group). The primary outcome investigated in this post-hoc analysis was the incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS: The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events across the different groups of pretrial OADs were comparable between liraglutide and additional OAD (α-glucosidase inhibitor 74.6 vs 70.0%; glinide 93.1 vs 87.1%; metformin 91.8 vs 87.1%; thiazolidinedione 86.2 vs 96.4%, respectively). Minor hypoglycemia was infrequent (seven episodes in two patients randomized to liraglutide, and two episodes in two patients randomized to additional OAD). The mean reduction in glycated hemoglobin appeared greater with liraglutide therapy, with the estimated mean treatment difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) for liraglutide vs additional OAD ranging from -0.14%, 95% CI: -0.48 to 0.21 (-1.5 mmol/mol, 95 CI: -5.2 to 2.3) to -0.44%, 95% CI:-0.79 to -0.09 (-4.8 mmol/mol, 95% CI: -8.6 to -1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggests that Japanese patients on OAD monotherapy might benefit from a greater improvement in glycemic control, without impacting tolerability, by combining their OAD with liraglutide rather than another OAD, regardless of which OAD monotherapy they are receiving.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28984041 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide.