GLPwatch

Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide in a predominantly Asian population with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with basal insulin: The GetGoal-L-C randomized trial.

Diabetes Obes Metab · 2018

Last updated 2026-05-28

In a study of 448 Asian adults with type 2 diabetes not well-controlled by basal insulin, adding lixisenatide improved blood sugar control more than a placebo over 24 weeks. Those taking lixisenatide also lost an average of 1.12 kg in weight and required 3.0 fewer units of insulin daily, but reported more side effects (63.8% vs 40.8%). The rate of low blood sugar episodes was similar between groups.

AI summary of the abstract below.

JournalDiabetes Obes Metab, 2018
Citations31
Relative citation ratio1.17
NIH percentile56
Molecules lixisenatide
Conditions studied Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the effects on glycaemic control of lixisenatide vs placebo as add-on treatment to basal insulin (BI) ± metformin and effects on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction in patients with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Patients (n = 448) with inadequately controlled T2D were randomized (1:1) to lixisenatide or placebo as add-on to BI ± metformin for 24 weeks after an 8-week run-in phase, during which BI was titrated to a target self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG; 4.4-5.6 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included: percentage of responders; changes in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG); 7-point SMPG (daily average); body weight (BW); total daily BI dose; fasting plasma glucose; and safety assessments. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar in the two treatment groups. After insulin optimization during run-in, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in mean change from baseline (7.9% [standard deviation {s.d.}, 0.66] and 7.9% [0.70], respectively) to week 24 in HbA1c (least squares mean [standard error {s.e.}] change -0.62% [0.09] vs -0.11% [0.09]; P < .0001, respectively) and higher proportions of patients achieved HbA1c targets. Two-hour PPG, daily mean SMPG and mean BW were reduced further and daily BI dose was lower with lixisenatide than placebo (-1.12 kg vs 0.04 kg [P < .0001]; -3.0 U vs -1.9 U [P = .0033], respectively). Treatment-emergent adverse events were greater with lixisenatide than placebo (63.8% vs 40.8%, respectively). The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia was similar (lixisenatide 15.6% vs placebo 13.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In Asian patients insufficiently controlled on BI ± metformin, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in glycaemic control, with a tolerability profile in line with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01632163 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28742225 ↗

Related research