Effectiveness of Liraglutide and Lixisenatide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Evidence from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database in the United Kingdom.
Diabetes Ther · 2017
Last updated 2026-05-28A study of 792 adults in the UK with type 2 diabetes found that after one year, liraglutide reduced blood sugar levels more than lixisenatide, with an average difference of 0.30 percentage points. Patients taking liraglutide were 2.5 times more likely to reach a blood sugar target below 6.5% and also more likely to meet other blood sugar goals compared to those taking lixisenatide. Changes in weight and blood pressure were slightly greater with liraglutide, but the differences were not statistically significant. Overall healthcare use was similar between the two groups.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Diabetes Ther, 2017 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 19 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.83 |
| NIH percentile | 44 |
| Molecules | liraglutide, lixisenatide |
| Conditions studied | Type 2 Diabetes |
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists liraglutide and lixisenatide are effective at reducing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although liraglutide has demonstrated superior efficacy in head-to-head clinical trials, real-world evidence of comparative effectiveness is lacking. This observational study aimed to assess the effectiveness of liraglutide versus lixisenatide in UK clinical practice.
METHODS: Electronic medical records from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) UK primary care database were analyzed. Patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with T2DM, and prescribed liraglutide or lixisenatide between 01 May 2013 and 31 December 2015 were included in the study. Adjusted linear regression models compared the difference in mean change in HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 12-month follow-up. The proportion of patients achieving glycemic control (HbA1c <6.5%, <7.0%, <7.5%); HbA1c reduction >1%; and weight reduction ≥3% within 12 months were determined. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the effect of treatment on time to achieving HbA1c and weight reduction targets. Healthcare resource use (HCRU) (GP, secondary care, hospitalizations) was compared using analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: The primary outcome was assessed in 579 liraglutide and 213 lixisenatide new users. Fully adjusted linear regression indicated that liraglutide reduced HbA1c significantly more than lixisenatide (mean treatment difference -0.30; 95% CI -0.56, -0.04; p = 0.025). Compared to lixisenatide, liraglutide recipients were 2.5 times more likely to achieve HbA1c <6.5% (p = 0.0002). Liraglutide users were also more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% (HR 2.10; p < 0.0001), <7.5% (HR 1.65; p < 0.0001), and >1% HbA1c reduction (HR 1.29; p = 0.0002). BMI and SBP reductions were greater for the liraglutide group but results were not significant. HCRU was comparable between treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: These results from the THIN database indicate that liraglutide treatment provided better outcomes related to glycemic control.
FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28281244 ↗
Related research
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management.
- Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
- Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.
- Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.
- The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide-dependent weight loss.
- Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.