Acute effects of glucagon-like peptide-1, GLP-1<sub>9-36 amide</sub>, and exenatide on mesenteric blood flow, cardiovascular parameters, and biomarkers in healthy volunteers.
Physiol Rep · 2017
Last updated 2026-05-28In a study of eight healthy volunteers, injections of GLP-1, its metabolite GLP-1<sub>9-36 amide</sub>, or the GLP-1 drug exenatide did not change blood flow in the intestines or kidneys. However, GLP-1 increased heart rate compared to saline, while exenatide and GLP-1<sub>9-36 amide</sub> did not. Blood pressure remained unchanged, and as expected, GLP-1 and exenatide lowered blood sugar and boosted insulin levels.
AI summary of the abstract below.
| Journal | Physiol Rep, 2017 |
|---|---|
| Citations | 14 |
| Relative citation ratio | 0.56 |
| NIH percentile | 32 |
| Molecules | exenatide |
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1, GLP-1) and its sister peptide glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) influence numerous intestinal functions and GLP-2 greatly increases intestinal blood flow. We hypothesized that GLP-1 also stimulates intestinal blood flow and that this would impact on the overall digestive and cardiovascular effects of the hormone. To investigate the influence of GLP-1 receptor agonism on mesenteric and renal blood flow and cardiovascular parameters, we carried out a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. A total of eight healthy volunteers received high physiological subcutaneous injections of GLP-1, GLP-1 (bioactive metabolite), exenatide (stable GLP-1 agonist), or saline on four separate days. Blood flow in mesenteric, celiac, and renal arteries was measured by Doppler ultrasound. Blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume were measured continuously using an integrated system. Plasma was analyzed for glucose, GLP-1 (intact and total), exenatide and Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and serum for insulin and C-peptide. Neither GLP-1, GLP-1, exenatide nor saline elicited any changes in blood flow parameters in the mesenteric or renal arteries. GLP-1 significantly increased heart rate (two-way ANOVA, injection [ = 0.0162], time [ = 0.0038], and injection × time [ = 0.082]; Tukey post hoc GLP-1 vs. saline and GLP-1 [ < 0.011]), and tended to increase cardiac output and decrease stroke volume compared to GLP-1 and saline. Blood pressures were not affected. As expected, glucose levels fell and insulin secretion increased after infusion of both GLP-1 and exenatide.
Verbatim abstract via PubMed 28235974 ↗
Related research
- Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.
- Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
- Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
- Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study.